Customized | Quality Control | Case | Blogs | Download | FAQ
Views: 19 Author: HUIHE Editorial Team Publish Time: 2026-07-14 Origin: HUIHE PACK
Most beverage brands sourcing glass beverage bottles know they need something from their supplier related to food safety compliance. The difficulty is that "FDA compliance" and "REACH compliance" are frequently mentioned as if they're equivalent certificates that a supplier either has or doesn't have — when in practice they're two structurally different regulatory frameworks that apply to different aspects of the product, tested and documented differently, and both requiring more specificity than a generic "we're compliant" assurance delivers.
This guide covers what each framework actually requires for beverage glass specifically, where the documentation gaps most commonly arise, and what to ask your supplier for, and why — with particular attention to the decorated glass case, which carries meaningfully different compliance requirements than plain undecorated glass and is frequently underspecified in supplier briefs.
Table of Contents
Yes, but not in the same way it applies to chemical substances or mixtures. Glass bottles are "articles" under REACH, meaning the regulation's main obligation for them is the Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) notification requirement: if a bottle contains any of the substances on ECHA's SVHC Candidate List above a concentration of 0.1% by weight, the supplier must communicate this to customers and, if annual quantities exceed one tonne, notify ECHA. As of February 2026, the SVHC Candidate List includes 253 substances. Standard soda-lime glass used in beverage bottles typically contains none of these, but decorated glass — with ceramic inks, metallic pigments, or surface coatings — warrants case-by-case verification.
A Declaration of Compliance (DoC) is a manufacturer's written statement that a glass article meets the requirements of EU Regulation 1935/2004 (the framework regulation for all food contact materials in Europe) and any applicable good manufacturing practice requirements. Unlike a third-party certificate, it is self-issued by the manufacturer but must be backed by supporting test data and documentation available for inspection. For plain glass bottles, the DoC is relatively straightforward. For bottles with coatings, inks, or surface treatments, the DoC must address those materials separately, since they introduce migration considerations the bare glass doesn't.
No government certification exists for this purpose. Glass is recognized as Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) for food contact under the US FDA framework, meaning it doesn't require the pre-market notification process that applies to new food contact substances. The relevant compliance obligation for a glass bottle manufacturer is operating in accordance with Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP) regulations under 21 CFR Part 117, Subpart B. "FDA certified glass" is not a formal status — what buyers should request instead is documentation of GMP compliance and, for decorated glass, test reports on any surface treatments or coatings that contact the beverage.
No. Unlike plastics, which have EU Regulation 10/2011 as a dedicated harmonized standard, there is currently no EU-specific regulation for glass food contact materials. Glass falls under the general framework of Regulation 1935/2004 and associated Good Manufacturing Practice regulation 2023/2006. This means the compliance documentation standard for plain glass is less prescriptive than for plastic packaging — but it also means there's more room for documentation gaps when suppliers apply a "no specific regulation exists, so we're fine" logic without providing substantive testing evidence.
The most persistent confusion in this area is treating REACH and FDA compliance as two versions of the same thing — a food safety certificate that a supplier either has or doesn't. In practice, they're parallel frameworks addressing different risks through different mechanisms.
Framework | Primary Concern | What It Governs for Glass | Documentation Type |
|---|---|---|---|
EU REACH (Regulation EC 1907/2006) | Chemical substance hazards in products — occupational, environmental, and consumer safety | SVHC presence in glass and any coatings/treatments above 0.1% w/w; SCIP database notification | SVHC declaration; SCIP database entries |
EU Food Contact (Regulation EC 1935/2004) | Safety of materials in direct contact with food or beverages — migration of substances into what we eat and drink | Overall and specific migration limits for glass and any surface treatments in contact with beverage | Declaration of Compliance (DoC); migration test reports |
US FDA (21 CFR, FFDCA) | Safety of indirect food additives and materials used in food packaging | GMP compliance for the glass manufacturer; testing of coatings/inks if present (21 CFR 175.300 for coatings) | GMP compliance documentation; test reports for coatings where applicable |
A supplier can be REACH compliant (no SVHCs above the threshold in the glass composition) while still having an inadequate EU food contact Declaration of Compliance that lacks supporting migration test data. A supplier can have good GMP documentation for FDA purposes while having no SVHC or SCIP documentation at all for the EU market. These are distinct compliance exercises, and a buyer sourcing for multiple export markets may need all three.
EU REACH (Regulation EC 1907/2006) applies to glass bottles as "articles" — manufactured objects where the chemical composition determines function less than its shape, surface, or design. For articles, the key obligation under REACH is Article 33: if a Substance of Very High Concern from the SVHC Candidate List is present in the article above 0.1% by weight, the supplier must proactively communicate this to customers, and inform consumers on request within 45 days.
As of February 4, 2026, the SVHC Candidate List stands at 253 substances, following the addition of n-hexane and Bisphenol AF earlier this year. The list is updated periodically by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), and if a substance is present above 0.1% w/w and annual export quantities exceed one tonne, importers and producers of articles must also notify ECHA within six months of the substance's addition to the list.
For standard soda-lime glass used in most beverage bottles — composed primarily of silicon dioxide, sodium oxide, calcium oxide, and aluminium oxide — none of the current SVHC substances are present in the glass matrix at concentrations exceeding the 0.1% threshold. The practical compliance risk for plain glass bottles under REACH is low. Where REACH requires closer attention for glass packaging is the decoration and treatment layer: certain ceramic ink pigments, metallic colorants, and specialty coatings can contain compounds that have been or may be added to the SVHC list, and these need to be evaluated specifically rather than assumed safe because the glass substrate itself is clean.
A frequently overlooked REACH obligation for glass bottle suppliers exporting to the EU is the SCIP database — the Substances of Concern in Products database maintained by ECHA. From January 5, 2021, articles containing more than 0.1% of substances listed on the SVHC Candidate List must be submitted to ECHA's SCIP database, enabling authorities and recyclers to identify hazardous substances through the entire lifecycle of the article.
For most plain glass beverage bottles, this obligation doesn't trigger because no SVHCs are present above the threshold. But for decorated glass — particularly bottles with complex multi-element ACL printing, specialized coatings, or metallic surface treatments — verifying SVHC content in the applied materials is a prerequisite to knowing whether SCIP notification is required. A supplier who hasn't evaluated their decoration materials against the SVHC candidate list isn't necessarily non-compliant, but they can't confirm compliance either — which is itself a documentation gap that creates risk for the buyer placing goods on the EU market.
Parallel to REACH, EU Regulation 1935/2004 establishes the overarching requirement that all food contact materials — including glass — must be safe, inert, and not transfer their constituents to food in quantities that could endanger human health or cause unacceptable changes in the food's characteristics.
Unlike plastics, which have a dedicated harmonized EU regulation (EU 10/2011) specifying permitted substances and migration limits, glass currently has no equivalent specific EU regulation. This is significant for buyers to understand: there is no "glass-specific approved substance list" analogous to the plastics regulation's positive list. Glass food contact compliance is evaluated under the general framework and good manufacturing practice requirements, supported by migration testing.
The standard documentation is a Declaration of Compliance (DoC), in which the glass manufacturer declares that the article meets the requirements of Regulation 1935/2004 and the Good Manufacturing Practice regulation (2023/2006). A well-prepared DoC should reference the specific articles and conditions of use it covers, identify any intentionally used substances, and be backed by supporting test documentation — particularly for any surface treatments, coatings, or inks present on the bottle.
For a deeper look at what this document is and how it differs from CE marking and other certification types (a common source of confusion), see our guide on glass bottle factory certifications.
In the US, glass is among the oldest and most well-established food contact materials, and its safety status is correspondingly settled. The FDA recognizes glass as Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) for food contact — meaning it has a long history of safe use and is not subject to the pre-market notification process required for new food contact substances.
The relevant compliance obligation for a glass bottle manufacturer under US FDA framework is primarily Good Manufacturing Practice compliance under 21 CFR Part 117, Subpart B. This is not a certification in the government-issued sense — there is no FDA certificate for food contact glass — but rather a documented manufacturing quality standard that the factory should be able to demonstrate is in place. For an imported glass bottle, the US importer of record bears the compliance responsibility; the glass supplier should be able to provide documentation supporting the importer's own compliance assessment.
A key distinction from the EU: unlike EU Regulation 1935/2004, the US FDA framework does not require a Declaration of Compliance document from the packaging manufacturer. Declaration of compliance is not compulsory for food contact materials in the USA, though buyers can request a letter of guarantee from the manufacturer confirming the material is suitable for the intended food contact use. For coatings applied to glass, however, 21 CFR 175.300 (Resinous and Polymeric Coatings) does apply and requires that the coating formulation meets the applicable positive list requirements — this is where FDA documentation for decorated glass becomes substantive rather than optional.
Everything described above applies most cleanly to plain, undecorated glass. The compliance picture becomes meaningfully more complex the moment decoration is involved — whether that's ACL ceramic screen printing, metallic inks, acid frosting, or specialty surface coatings.
Decoration Type | Specific Compliance Consideration | Additional Documentation Needed |
|---|---|---|
ACL ceramic screen printing (exterior only) | Ceramic inks contain metal-based pigments; must be verified for SVHC content and food contact migration if any ink borders the contact zone | Ink supplier's REACH SVHC declaration; confirmation that inks are applied exterior-only with no contact with beverage |
Metallic inks (gold, silver, copper effects) | Metallic pigments may include compounds of concern; exterior-only application requires SVHC check; interior application triggers migration testing requirement | SVHC declaration for ink formulation; migration test report if any metallic element is in the contact zone |
Acid frosting (exterior surface treatment) | Acid etching is applied to exterior surface; if treatment is exterior-only, food contact impact is negligible; interior or shared-zone application introduces different considerations | Confirmation of treatment zone (exterior only); DoC covering the treatment |
Internal coatings (rare; used for specialty applications) | Direct food contact surface — most stringent compliance requirements; specific migration testing against beverage simulants required | Full migration test report per EU 1935/2004; FDA 21 CFR 175.300 compliance documentation for US market |
The most important practical point: compliance documentation for a decorated glass bottle must address the decoration layer as a separate component from the glass substrate. A DoC that covers the glass but is silent on the ink, coating, or surface treatment is incomplete for decorated bottles — yet this is a very common gap in what suppliers actually provide. When requesting samples for decorated bottles, also request the compliance documentation for the specific ink or coating formulation used, not just a general glass DoC.
For brands placing products in the California market specifically, Proposition 65 (the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986) adds a state-level layer on top of federal FDA requirements. Prop 65 requires businesses to provide a warning before knowingly exposing individuals to chemicals listed as known to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
For glass beverage bottles, the Prop 65 exposure route of most practical concern is lead and cadmium from decorated surfaces. Bottles with decorative exterior coatings containing these metals — even at levels that would be considered low by other standards — may trigger Prop 65 warning obligations if the chemicals are present above the safe harbor levels. This is particularly relevant for decorative glass with traditional metallic glaze-style decoration, and less so for modern food-grade ceramic inks formulated specifically to eliminate heavy metal content.
Document | Relevant for | What It Should Confirm |
|---|---|---|
EU Declaration of Compliance (DoC) — food contact | EU market | Reference to Regulation 1935/2004; specific article and conditions of use; coverage of both glass and any decoration/treatment |
REACH SVHC declaration | EU market | Explicit statement on whether any SVHC from the current Candidate List is present above 0.1% w/w in the glass and any applied decoration |
SCIP database confirmation | EU market | Confirmation that SCIP notification has been submitted if any SVHC is present above 0.1% in the article |
Migration test report | EU and US markets for decorated glass | Actual test data for overall migration and heavy metals (lead, cadmium specifically) conducted by a recognized testing laboratory |
GMP compliance documentation | US market | Confirmation of CGMP compliance under 21 CFR Part 117 Subpart B |
Coating/ink supplier's compliance documentation | Both markets, for decorated glass | REACH SVHC status of ink/coating formulation; food contact suitability confirmation from ink or coating supplier |
California Prop 65 assessment | US market, California specifically | Confirmation that no Prop 65 listed chemicals (particularly lead and cadmium from decorative coatings) are present above safe harbor levels |
Not necessarily on its own. A statement that glass is REACH compliant typically addresses SVHC content in the glass matrix — which for standard soda-lime glass is usually straightforward to confirm. But it may not cover SVHC status in applied decoration, SCIP database notification status, or EU food contact migration requirements under Regulation 1935/2004. Ask specifically which REACH obligations have been addressed and request the underlying documentation rather than relying on a verbal assurance.
Yes, and the changeover is generally favorable from a compliance documentation burden standpoint. PET bottles are subject to EU Regulation 10/2011's positive substance list requirements and its specific migration testing regime — a more detailed and prescriptive framework than glass currently has under EU 1935/2004. However, you will still need a DoC for the glass (covering both the glass substrate and any decoration), and if your PET bottles had no decoration but your new glass bottles do, the decorated glass compliance requirements are a new element that needs to be addressed proactively.
There's no fixed mandatory update cycle for REACH article declarations, but the SVHC Candidate List is updated multiple times per year — the list grew from 247 to 253 substances between January and February 2026 alone. A supplier's SVHC declaration is only accurate as of the date it was prepared against the list current at that time. For ongoing compliance assurance, buyers should request a re-confirmation from their supplier whenever the SVHC list is substantially updated, particularly if the product involves decoration with pigments or specialty materials that may be more likely to be affected by new additions.
No. The closure — whether a metal crown cap, screw cap, swing-top bail, or cork — is a separate article with its own food contact compliance requirements. Closure liners in particular (the compressible sealing material inside a metal cap) are direct food contact surfaces and need separate food contact compliance documentation from the closure supplier. This is a common oversight when brands source the glass and closure from different suppliers and only request compliance documentation from the glass manufacturer.
Here's what the compliance documentation process typically looks like when you order from us:
What documentation do you provide as standard?
For every order: EU Declaration of Compliance referencing Regulation 1935/2004, REACH SVHC declaration current at time of production, and GMP compliance confirmation for FDA purposes. These are issued per product code, not as generic factory-wide documents.
What additional documentation is available for decorated bottles?
For bottles with ACL printing, metallic inks, or surface treatments: SVHC declaration covering the specific ink or coating formulation used, plus migration test reports for heavy metals (lead, cadmium) from our third-party testing program. California Prop 65 assessment available on request for US-market decorated glass.
What if I need SCIP database confirmation?
We can confirm SCIP status for your order. For standard undecorated glass, confirmation of no SVHC above threshold is straightforward. For decorated glass, we run SVHC screening against the current Candidate List before production and confirm SCIP status at order confirmation.
How quickly can you provide documentation?
Standard EU DoC and REACH declaration: provided at order confirmation. Migration test reports: available from our testing library for standard products; new testing for novel decoration specifications takes 3–4 weeks and should be built into the project timeline.
Request Compliance Documentation | max@huihepackaging.com
EUR-Lex — Regulation (EC) 1907/2006 — REACH
EUR-Lex — Regulation (EC) 1935/2004 — Food Contact Materials Framework
European Commission — Food Contact Materials (EU Commission)
U.S. FDA — Inventory of Food Contact Substances Listed in 21 CFR
California OEHHA — About Proposition 65